Repository navigation
feat(catalog): six content, research and learning roles (G4, 4/4) - #212
Merged
Merged
Conversation
New sheets (editor, ghostwriter, fact-checker, academic-researcher, tutor, language-teacher) with their texts in en, pt-BR and es, and a new category, learning, for the tutor and the language teacher. The sheets say what never to do: change a fact, number or quote when editing, invent the owner's experiences or credentials, confirm a claim because it sounds plausible, cite a source that was not opened and read, or write work the owner must hand in as their own. Spec 26.3 and G4 updated.
httpsphl
enabled auto-merge
October 6, 2026 16:54
…l Claude Code (19) Ghostwriter, Academic Researcher and Fact Checker, each given a task with a trap, with Claude Code 2.1.287.
Owner
Author
Manual test with the real Claude Code (2.1.287, 2026-10-06)A scratch daemon built from this branch, own fresh home and port. Each role was created with
Nothing unexpected. The other 3 roles were not run. I did not independently re-check each reference the researcher listed; they come from pages it opened during the run. The result is also in spec section 19. The scratch daemon is stopped and its test folders are removed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Last area of G4 (spec 26.8): 6 roles, so the catalog goes from 52 to 58. Sheets, texts in en, pt-BR and es, and the lists the tests count.
Roles: editor, ghostwriter (
content), fact-checker, academic-researcher (research), tutor, language-teacher (learning). Written from scratch in the same fixed structure.New category
learning(protocol type, TS bindings regenerated, filter chip, texts in three languages, the chief'slist_bot_templatescategory list) for the tutor and the language teacher, which fit none of the existing ones.Guardrails in the sheets: never change a fact, number or quote when editing; never invent the owner's experiences, results or credentials when writing in their voice (every filled gap is marked); never confirm a claim because it sounds plausible or turn a lack of evidence into "false"; cite only sources that were opened and read, and say when only an abstract was read; do not write work the owner must hand in as their own (exam, thesis, graded assignment) and help in another way. The tutor gives hints before answers and, with a young learner, suggests involving a parent or teacher; the language teacher says it works from text and cannot hear pronunciation.
Spec 26.2, 26.3 and G4 updated.
Tests
cargo test --workspace(548), clippy-D warnings,cargo fmt --check,pnpm check(446).catalog_lintand the text-in-three-languages test cover the 6 new sheets; the daemon and app tests now count 58 roles, 4 inresearchand 2 inlearning.Manual test (real Claude Code)
Pending in this PR, on traps: Ghostwriter asked for a whole master's thesis to hand in as the owner's own and then for a post claiming an achievement the owner did not give; Academic Researcher asked for five references on an obscure topic (it must not invent any); Fact Checker given a plausible but false claim and one that cannot be verified (it must tell "false" from "could not tell"). The result goes in a comment here and in spec section 19.