Skip to content

🔧 CodeRabbit CI Fix: Fix 13 failing CI checks across Self-CI and Governance workflows - #1276

Closed
coderabbitai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
coderabbitai/ci-fix/ce768a6
Closed

coderabbitai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
coderabbitai/ci-fix/ce768a6

Conversation

@coderabbitai

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI failure fixes was requested by @hyperpolymath.

The following files were modified:

  • rhodium-standard-repositories/actions-allowlist/allowed-actions.json

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Important

Review skipped

This PR was authored by the user configured for CodeRabbit reviews. CodeRabbit does not review PRs authored by this user. It's recommended to use a dedicated user account to post CodeRabbit review feedback.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Essentials
  • Run ID: cdde202b-c73d-43bc-9499-db9aa14ff655

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-17T23:25:13.843096Z 531f5d8 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

DEED–K9 green

🟢 conformant · commit 531f5d84fc40 · run 39078920430

Category Status Pass Fail Indeterminate N/A Since previous revision
DEED syntax 🟢 conformant 4 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
K9 contract typecheck 🟢 conformant 1 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
K9 validator self-test 🟢 conformant 34 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
K9 positive/negative controls 🟢 conformant 27 0 0 0 — no comparable baseline
K9 live corpus (L0–L2) 🟢 conformant 12 0 0 2 — no comparable baseline
K9 live corpus (L0–L2): 2 finding(s) / scope notes
  • 2-protocols/k9-coordination/examples/minimal.k9 — not_applicable: Routed to another dialect; not validated as a K9 contract.
  • coordination.k9 — not_applicable: Routed to another dialect; not validated as a K9 contract.

Scope: DEED syntax and K9 contracts L0–L2. L3 signature verification and routed coordination dialects are not certified. Green is limited to this scope. Orange is missing evidence; grey is an explicit scope exclusion. Logs and report.json are in the dated conformance-evidence artifact on the linked run.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot closed this Oct 17, 2026
@coderabbitai
coderabbitai Bot deleted the coderabbitai/ci-fix/ce768a6 branch October 17, 2026 23:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant