Skip to content

tests: use private temp dir for route scanner probe to prevent symlink clobbering - #379

Closed
luvs01 wants to merge 9 commits into
devfrom
codex/propose-fix-for-symlink-vulnerability
Closed

tests: use private temp dir for route scanner probe to prevent symlink clobbering#379
luvs01 wants to merge 9 commits into
devfrom
codex/propose-fix-for-symlink-vulnerability

Conversation

@luvs01

@luvs01 luvs01 commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Motivation

  • The scanner test previously wrote a fixed repository-root file (.tmp-scanner-probe.ts) with a plain writeFileSync, which can follow a pre-planted workspace symlink and truncate an attacker-chosen target; this change removes that attack surface.

Description

  • Create the probe inside an atomically-created private temp directory using mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "ocx-route-scanner-")), write it with writeFileSync, and remove the whole temp directory with rmSync(..., { recursive: true, force: true }), and add the required node:fs/node:os imports to tests/management-route-registry.test.ts.

Testing

  • Ran the focused checks bun test tests/management-route-registry.test.ts (passed), bun run typecheck (passed), and bun run privacy:scan (passed), and validated the scanner assertion still fails loud when appropriate; a full bun run test run was not relied on here because unrelated existing suite failures/timeouts were observed when run end-to-end.

Codex Task

lidge-jun and others added 9 commits August 25, 2026 10:36
release: promote dev into main for v2.32.1
# Conflicts:
#	package.json
[WRONG BRANCH] merge dev into main for the v2.33.0 release
Promotes the dev integration line onto main. The resulting tree is byte-identical
to origin/dev, including package.json at 2.34.0.

The package.json conflict is resolved to dev's side, NOT to main's stale 2.33.0.
Earlier promotions (lidge-jun#2553, lidge-jun#2507) kept the target's version so the release bump
would land on its own "release: vX.Y.Z" commit. That is no longer legal: this very
delta adds tests/release-version-line.test.ts, which fails when the in-tree version
sits behind the highest release tag. With v2.34.0-preview.20260827 now published,
2.33.0 orders behind it, so a promotion carrying the stale line turns CI red on
every shard that runs the suite.

The consequence for the release step is that scripts/release.ts skips the bump
(release.ts:568, currentVersion === version), so v2.34.0 gets tagged on this merge
commit rather than on a separate release commit. The workflow creates the tag itself
after publishing and validates expected-sha against the checked-out commit, so the
tag still names exactly the audited tree.
[WRONG BRANCH] promote dev onto main for v2.34.0
[WRONG BRANCH] promote dev onto main for v2.35.0
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-08-30T15:10:02.346859Z f1bbd1e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the chore label Aug 30, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: 552c3b5f-3a01-4bda-b803-952f1ba5bd25


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the title tests: use private temp dir for route scanner probe to prevent symlink clobbering [WRONG BRANCH] tests: use private temp dir for route scanner probe to prevent symlink clobbering Aug 30, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ READY

  • all PR quality gates passed.

Hygiene

Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

@github-actions
github-actions Bot marked this pull request as draft August 30, 2026 15:08
@luvs01 luvs01 changed the title [WRONG BRANCH] tests: use private temp dir for route scanner probe to prevent symlink clobbering tests: use private temp dir for route scanner probe to prevent symlink clobbering Sep 3, 2026
@luvs01
luvs01 changed the base branch from main to dev September 3, 2026 06:23
@github-actions
github-actions Bot marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2026 06:32
@luvs01

luvs01 commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Closing this personal-fork review path because lidge-jun#3323 carries the same patch and additionally includes the reviewed cleanup fix.

@luvs01 luvs01 closed this Sep 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants