Repository navigation
fix(hubs): stop price transform row fan-out and fix eligibility scoping - #2246
Michael Flanakin (flanakin) wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
Prices_transform_v1_0/v1_2 are Data Explorer update policy functions, so each parquet-snappy file in a pricesheet export triggers a SEPARATE invocation that only sees that file's rows of Prices_raw (#1625). Two independent bugs stem from this: - The savings plan price lookup deduped its Consumption dimension side with `distinct` over columns that vary by region/currency, so a meter with multiple regional prices sharing the same tmp_SavingsPlanKey fanned out every matching savings plan row (Prices_final row count exceeding Prices_raw, #1736). Switched to `summarize take_any(...) by tmp_SavingsPlanKey` for a guaranteed one-row-per-key dimension side, per the lookup/join guidance in docs-wiki/Coding-guidelines.md. - Commitment discount eligibility was derived from `riMeters`/ `spMeters` built from Prices_raw within the same invocation, so a meter's Reservation/SavingsPlan row and Consumption row could be split across invocations and evaluated against a partial view (#1625). Eligibility is now sourced from the CommitmentDiscountEligibility open-data table (already used for the commitment eligibility fetch in #2164), wired into ADX as a new reference table alongside PricingUnits/Regions/ResourceTypes/Services, which isn't affected by per-invocation partitioning. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…V load The new CommitmentDiscountEligibility lookup (#2246) joined the pricesheet's x_SkuMeterId against the open-data table's MeterId with case-sensitive equality. The open-data generator lowercases MeterId, but Cost Management's pricesheet schema doesn't document or guarantee casing, so a mismatch would silently default every affected meter's eligibility to 'Not Eligible' with no error. Both sides are now normalized to lowercase before the join. Also bumped the new "Update CommitmentDiscountEligibility in ADX" pipeline activity from retry:0/20min to retry:2/30min -- the CSV it loads is ~8x larger than the next biggest reference table (ResourceTypes), so it's more exposed to transient network failures than the sibling activities this pattern was copied from. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Reviewed via a multi-angle code review pass (correctness, removed-behavior, cross-file/deployment tracing, reuse/simplification). Summary: Core fix is sound. The row-fan-out fix ( Fixed in
Not in scope for this PR, flagged for follow-up:
Verified after the fix: |
Roland Krummenacher (RolandKrummenacher)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review — PR #2246
The root-cause analysis holds up on both counts, and I verified the supporting claims: the "~8x larger than ResourceTypes" figure is right (5.7 MB vs 718 KB, 92,283 rows), Package-Toolkit.ps1:239 picks the CSV up via its *.csv wildcard so no packaging change is needed, the open-data.md#commitment-discount-eligibility anchor resolves, and the ingestion_InitScripts → ingestion_VersionedScripts ordering claim is correct.
Two findings I'd treat as blocking, one substantive, and one thing I want to defend pre-emptively so it doesn't get bounced. Details inline; summary:
- Blocking — local hubs silently get 100% "Not Eligible".
devgainedIngestionSetup_OpenDataExternal.kqlin #2187, merged after this branch forked. It's the local/emulator population path for the open-data tables. This PR adds a fifth table but populates it only through the new ADF activity, which local hubs never run. - Blocking — Azure Government and China hubs regress to 100% "Not Eligible". The generator reads the public-cloud retail catalog only; those clouds' meter IDs aren't in it. The current self-derived logic works there precisely because it reads the customer's own pricesheet.
- Substantive —
take_anyreplaces a loud bug with a quiet one. Row inflation is genuinely fixed, but the arbitrary pick can stamp one billing profile's negotiated price onto another's savings plan rows. - Not a problem — the
tolower()normalization is correct and does not violate the repo KQL rule. Flagging so a later reviewer doesn't reject it on a false positive.
On the two open questions in the description: keeping the v1_0 change is the right call in my view — deprecated or not, it's what #1736 was reported against, and leaving the two versions divergent costs more than it saves. And I agree the open-data lookup beats options 1 and 2; my objection is to its current failure modes, not the approach.
Coordination: #2251 rewrites Update-CommitmentDiscountEligibility.ps1 and renames .shardcounts.json → .familycounts.json. No file overlap with this PR, but this PR makes hub ingestion depend on that CSV's completeness, which raises the stakes on the traversal correctness considerably. I'd land #2251 first.
The CONFLICTING state is only changelog.md — trivial.
…ces-transform # Conflicts: # docs-mslearn/toolkit/changelog.md
…afer savings plan key - Add CommitmentDiscountEligibility to IngestionSetup_OpenDataExternal.kql for local hubs - Fall back to pricesheet-derived eligibility when a meter is missing from open data - Include billing profile and currency in the savings plan lookup key; restore prefilter - Merge dev; keep corrected Spend/Usage semantics (#2279) - Note infra-script-first for Fabric upgrades Co-Authored-By: RolandKrummenacher <RolandKrummenacher@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ression tests Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
🤖 [AI] PR update
|
Root-cause findings
Both issues trace back to a shared mechanism (per-invocation partial visibility of
Prices_raw) but manifest as two distinct bugs, both present inPrices_transform_v1_0()/Prices_transform_v1_2()(src/templates/finops-hub/modules/Microsoft.FinOpsHubs/Analytics/scripts/IngestionSetup_v1_0.kql,IngestionSetup_v1_2.kql):Prices_transform_v1_0/v1_2are Data Explorer update policy functions. When a pricesheet export lands as multipleparquet-snappyfiles, each file triggers a separate invocation of the update policy, soPrices_rawas seen inside the function during any one execution is only that file's subset of rows (confirmed root cause of #1625).#1736 (row inflation) — confirmed, distinct mechanism from the eligibility gap:
The savings plan enrichment step:
tmp_SavingsPlanKey = strcat(x_SkuMeterId, x_SkuProductId, x_SkuId, x_SkuTier, x_SkuOfferId)— it does not include region, billing profile, or currency. Azure meter prices vary by region/currency, so the same key can legitimately have multiple Consumption rows with differentListUnitPrice/ContractedUnitPrice/x_BaseUnitPrice.distinctover those columns does not guarantee one row per key, so the dimension side of thelookupcan have >1 row pertmp_SavingsPlanKey, andlookup kind=leftouterfans out every matching SavingsPlan row on the left — exactly the guideline this repo'sdocs-wiki/Coding-guidelines.mdalready documents (distinct Key, Col1, Col2fans out; usesummarize take_any(...) by Keyinstead). This reproduces within a single update-policy invocation whenever one file contains multi-region/multi-currency Consumption rows for the same meter+product+SKU — it doesn't strictly require the per-file scoping bug, though more files per invocation increases the chance of collisions.Fix:
summarize take_any(ListUnitPrice), take_any(ContractedUnitPrice), take_any(x_BaseUnitPrice) by tmp_SavingsPlanKeyon the dimension side, guaranteeing one row per key.#1625 (eligibility correctness) — confirmed and fixed, not just documented:
This self-references
prices(derived fromPrices_raw) to buildriMeters/spMeters, which only contain meters visible in the current invocation. If a meter's Reservation/SavingsPlan row lands in one file and its Consumption row lands in another, they're evaluated in separate invocations and eligibility comes out wrong — this is the literal mechanism discussed in #1625.Fix (option 3 from the #1625 discussion — already half-built):
src/open-data/CommitmentDiscountEligibility.csvalready exists (added in #2164, refreshed weekly from the Azure Retail Prices API,MeterIdconfirmed unique — 0 duplicates checked) with exactly the two eligibility columns the transform computes. It just wasn't wired into the hub database yet. This PR:CommitmentDiscountEligibilityADX table (IngestionSetup_HubInfra.kql), alongside the existingPricingUnits/Regions/ResourceTypes/Servicesreference tables..set-or-replace ... externaldata(...)pipeline activity inapp.bicepto load the CSV, following the exact same pattern as those tables (same dependency chain position, same command shape).riMeters/spMetersself-referencing logic withlookup kind=leftouter (CommitmentDiscountEligibility) on x_SkuMeterId, dimension side deduped withsummarize take_any(...) by MeterIdper the join/lookup guidelines. Eligibility is now global (not per-invocation-partial), so this closes the root cause of Prices_transform_v1_0 function does not work as intended #1625, not just a symptom.The RI-exclusion semantics (
x_SkuPriceType != 'ReservedInstance'— a Reservation-priced row is never itself "eligible for reservation") and the "unmatched meter defaults to Not Eligible" behavior are both preserved.What changed
src/templates/finops-hub/modules/Microsoft.FinOpsHubs/Analytics/scripts/IngestionSetup_v1_0.kql,IngestionSetup_v1_2.kql: fixed the savings-plan lookup fan-out; replaced self-referencing eligibility calc with a lookup againstCommitmentDiscountEligibility.src/templates/finops-hub/modules/Microsoft.FinOpsHubs/Analytics/scripts/IngestionSetup_HubInfra.kql: added theCommitmentDiscountEligibilitytable schema.src/templates/finops-hub/modules/Microsoft.FinOpsHubs/Analytics/app.bicep: added theUpdate CommitmentDiscountEligibility in ADXpipeline activity, spliced into the existing dependency chain (afterUpdate Services in ADX, beforeIngestion Complete).docs-mslearn/toolkit/changelog.md: unreleased entries for both fixes.Verification
bicep buildon the modifiedapp.bicep— compiles cleanly.Invoke-Pester -Path src/powershell/Tests/Lint/KqlJoinKinds.Tests.ps1— 436/436 passed (no bare joins, no ARG-rejected operators introduced).Invoke-Pester -Path src/powershell/Tests/Unit/HubsKqlOperators.Tests.ps1— 142/142 passed.Invoke-Pester -Path src/powershell/Tests/Unit/HubsIngestionQueries.Tests.ps1,src/powershell/Tests/Unit/HubsContractedCostGuard.Tests.ps1,src/powershell/Tests/Unit/HubsAdfTriggerTimeZones.Tests.ps1— no failures.ingestion_VersionedScripts(which deploys the transform functions)dependsOningestion_InitScripts(which deploysIngestionSetup_HubInfra.kql, creatingCommitmentDiscountEligibilitybefore it's referenced).Open questions / risks / scope not covered
.updatecommand) — the open-data lookup is less invasive and matches RolandKrummenacher's preferred direction.Prices_transform_v1_0is markedDEPRECATEDin its own docstring ("Use Prices_transform_v1_2() instead"), but issue [Hubs] Price ingestion creates extra rows #1736's reported counts were specifically againstPrices_transform_v1_0, so I fixed both versions for consistency; happy to drop the v1_0 change if it's considered out of scope for a deprecated path.CommitmentDiscountEligibilityopen-data CSV depends on the Azure Retail Prices API weekly refresh (Update-CommitmentDiscountEligibility.ps1) being current; a brand-new meter that hasn't been picked up by that refresh yet would default to "Not Eligible" until the next weekly run, versus the old logic which (when it worked) reflected same-day eligibility from the pricesheet export itself. This is a minor freshness trade-off in exchange for correctness/completeness.Prices_transform_v1_2()output) — no existing test harness runs the KQL transform logic itself (only lint/static checks), so this would be new test infrastructure; flagging as a possible follow-up rather than in scope here.Fixes #1736
Refs #1625