Skip to content

Handful of Variable Naming Convention Things #407

Closed

Description

@JZahner1

Some variable naming conventions in the ss3_var_names.csv seem inconsistent, or could otherwise probably be updated for clarity. The below is non exhaustive, and/or there may be good reasons why the current names were chosen:

SS3 Report Label Current alt_label Proposed alt_label Justification
BRatio biomass_ratio spawning_biomass_ratio From checking against the SS3 manual, this quantity always reflects spawning biomass.
annF_Btgt annual_F_biomass_target annual_fishing_mortality_biomass_target Would be nice for this quantity to be returned alongside other "fishing_mortality" labels, particularly for reference lines. Also, the current alt_label doesn't match naming conventions elsewhere.
annF_SPR annual_F_spawning_potential_ratio annual_fishing_mortality_spawning_potential_ratio Same as above
annF_MSY f_msy annual_fishing_mortality_msy Same as above

All of these were encountered when working on a draft Kobe plot figure.

Activity

  1. kellijohnson-NOAA commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @kellijohnson-NOAA
    Collaborator

    Sorry I am late to the party here but I don't see why we need to preface things with "annual" if it has an entry in the date/timing/year or whatever that column is called then people will know it pertains to a given year.

  2. Schiano-NOAA commented on Oct 15, 2026

    @Schiano-NOAA
    Collaborator

    @kellijohnson-NOAA you make a good point. We definitely don't need that in the labels.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions