Repository navigation
release: 7.44.0 - #3025
release: 7.44.0#3025
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Castiron custom codeEvaluated main: Trusted main policy: ✅ No new custom-code files detected. 0 mixed files remain; 0 existing customizations changed. Compared A changed generated baseline means this report cannot reliably identify which handwritten lines changed. Inspect the custom-code diffDownload the exact patch produced by this run (requires repository access): gh run download 40348288228 --repo openai/openai-node \
--name castiron-custom-code-40348288228-1 --dir /tmp/castiron-custom-code-40348288228-1
git apply --stat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-40348288228-1/custom-code.patch
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-40348288228-1/custom-code.patchOr reproduce it from an SDK checkout containing the vendored reporter: git fetch --no-tags origin 7562cd29af87561ccce4e1ec4b873c2c04c97f87 7cec0c4528f267de5ebe1a04cfb346f3d0cc4dc8
python3 scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py report \
--base 7562cd29af87561ccce4e1ec4b873c2c04c97f87 \
--head 7cec0c4528f267de5ebe1a04cfb346f3d0cc4dc8 --target-branch main --fetch --require-head-hash --public \
--out /tmp/castiron-custom-code-7cec0c4528f2
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-7cec0c4528f2/custom-code.patchThis is the current full custom patch for mixed files, not an attribution of only the handwritten lines changed by this PR. |
0d86e87 to
d731b53
Compare
d731b53 to
5bd2795
Compare
5bd2795 to
ed90b05
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ed90b0551d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
dpiet-oai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed release 7.44.0 at bf61eca. Version markers agree, and the changelog now documents the Live Decision item union migration. Verified both documented narrowing examples compile with the SDK TypeScript settings. Approval is for this release diff; merge remains conditional on clean CI.
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bf61eca0e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
dpiet-oai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the updated migration guidance. The content-property guard handles messages with an omitted discriminator; verified compilation and runtime behavior. Merge remains conditional on clean CI.
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ffa2549f52
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
dpiet-oai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the final release notes, including message narrowing and the image-model and scheduled-automations guidance, against the merged SDK source. Merge remains conditional on clean CI.
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
|
🤖 Created releases: 🌻 |
Automated Release PR
7.44.0 (2026-10-25)
Features
client.beta.agents.automations, including invocation endpoints and theautomationsagent-tool variant (#3029) (d8931e7)DecisionItemCreatedEvent.itemandDecisionItemCreateEvent.itemare unions, so callers that directly accessitem.contentoritem.rolemay no longer compile. For both event types, useif ('content' in event.item)before accessing message fields, and handle tool-item variants separately. Message items may omittype, so checking onlyitem.type === 'message'can skip valid messages. This release also updates image-model documentation:gpt-image-1was shut down on October 23, 2026; replace explicit selections withgpt-image-2.5-sunburstorgpt-image-2.5-flare. The documented default for Responses image-generation tools is nowgpt-image-2; specify a supported model explicitly when you need a particular model. (#3034) (7562cd2)Performance Improvements
Chores
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.