Fix Java parser corruption for inferred lambda parameters

[sebastianhaeni]

What's changed?

• Fixed Java 11, 17, 21, and 25 parser visitors so inferred lambda parameters are not misidentified as Lombok var/val.
• Added a regression test linked to Java parser corrupts inferred lambda parameters when type attribution is incomplete #8707.
• Preserved existing Lombok var/val parsing behavior.

What's your motivation?

• Fixes Java parser corrupts inferred lambda parameters when type attribution is incomplete #8707.

Anything in particular you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Please review whether hasLombokGeneratedSymbol(node) is the appropriate discriminator across all supported Java parser versions.

Checklist

• I've added unit tests to cover both positive and negative cases
• I've read and applied the recipe conventions and best practices (not applicable: this changes parser internals, not a recipe)
• I've run ./gradlew build locally, and committed any resulting changes to recipes.csv (targeted compatibility tests were run instead)
• I've formatted the lines I changed, without reformatting code I didn't touch

[timtebeek]

Cross linking to make review easier:

rewrite/rewrite-java-25/src/main/java/org/openrewrite/java/isolated/ReloadableJava25ParserVisitor.java

Lines 2204 to 2222 in c712840

	private static boolean hasLombokGeneratedSymbol(Tree t) {
	Tree tree = (t instanceof JCAnnotation) ? ((JCAnnotation) t).getAnnotationType() : t;
	Symbol sym = extractSymbol(tree);
	if (sym == null) {
	return false;
	}
	return isLombokAnnotationType(sym.getQualifiedName().toString()) ||
	sym.getDeclarationAttributes().stream()
	.map(a -> a.type.toString())
	.anyMatch(ReloadableJava25ParserVisitor::isLombokAnnotationType);
	}
	private static boolean isLombokAnnotationType(String name) {
	return "lombok.val".equals(name) ||
	"lombok.var".equals(name) ||
	"lombok.Generated".equals(name);
	}

[timtebeek]

Thanks a lot for the immediately proposed fix @sebastianhaeni ! I've kicked off CI, but will be out for three weeks after today, so I'll leave it up to colleagues to review and merge. 😅