test: add coverage for isStorageValueSet type guard - #30246
Conversation
Signed-off-by: EmaToplek <toplek.ema0213@outlook.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request extends ChangesStorage value set guard
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change adds coverage for storage value-set guard behavior without changing runtime behavior. No current merge-blocking risk remains. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Some tools did not complete. Review the errors below. 🔧 Biome (2.5.10)packages/2-sql/1-core/contract/test/storage-value-set.test.tsBiome could not lint this file: nested root configuration. Check the repository's Biome configuration and plugins. Comment |
Summary
Adds test coverage for the
isStorageValueSetruntime type guard inpackages/2-sql/1-core/contract/src/ir/storage-value-set.ts.storage-value-set.ts: 100% statements/branches/functions/lines (up from 57%/0%/50%/67%)Related to the M9 target-extensible-IR coverage gap noted in
coverage.config.json(TML-2521).Summary by CodeRabbit