Repository navigation
docs(whitepaper): finalize the paper language before minting - #6
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Three insertions, all from approved lines, no new claims: - Abstract names the product on its sanctioned surface: the technical-role line (whitepaper abstract is that line's owner per PROOFABLE-LANGUAGE). - Section 6 carries the operator-locked primitive-to-product bridge, so a reader can place Proofable instead of filing the paper as pure standards work. - Section 7 opens with the outcome and the differentiation (identity, context, limits, proof, and that those controls stay with the agent across models, tools, runtimes, and MCP). Title, privacy model, standards claims and the CAIP-380 framing are unchanged.
Merged one-line fragments into compact paragraphs. No claim changed: a sentence-level diff against the previous revision shows 166 sentences before and after, with one intentional rewrite ("path from:" joined to its arrows).\n\n- paragraphs 87 -> 56; single-sentence paragraphs 74 -> 29; mean 15.1 -> 24.3 words\n- words 2,467 unchanged; the paper does not get shorter, it stops reading like 4,000\n- built PDF 12 -> 11 pages, 293,547 bytes\n- every list, table, figure caption, Frame/img block, display line and reference block is untouched; section numbering unchanged\n- figure 3: "Explicit denial wins over general allowance." -> "Explicit denial overrides any allowance." (44 -> 40 characters, inside the 350px it has at 14px)\n\nReviewed against proofable-growth's compaction draft (job 6d77dd3e, ALLOW 0x82a08e24) and proofable-creative's figure audit (job 67def2b4, ALLOW 0x6cf21163). Rejected: turning the section 5 threat list and the section 4 delegation boundaries into prose, and splitting figure 1/4/5 lines whose overflow was estimated rather than measured.
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Finalizes the whitepaper language ahead of the mint. Keeps the whitepaper build tool out of the public repo (prior commit 9eec654). No content or contract change beyond the language pass.