Skip to content

Improve logic for deciding which sublattices are equivalent when checking ordering #23

Description

@bocklund

Currently, sublattices in ordered (partitioned) phases are considered equivalent by symmetry if their site ratios are equal. This is a poor heuristic and will fail to determine that sublattices 0 and 1 are equivalent in an FCC_L12 phase with sublattice model [['A', 'B'], ['A', 'B'], ['VA']] with site ratios [0.25, 0.75, 3].

Relevant for this fix will be the current heuristic in pycalphad models pycalphad/pycalphad#311, and the changes that will occur as a result of fixing pycalphad/pycalphad#345.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions