fix: enforce QA section boundaries and harden RAG indexing

[rostilos]

• isolate test-case and environment content using explicit sentinels
• replace only shareable QA sections with public preview links
• decouple retained RAG branches from branch-analysis patterns
• make incremental checkpoint reconciliation durable and observable
• allow initial snapshots without custom path filters

[codecrow-local]

✅ Code Analysis - No Issues Found

Quality Gate Default Quality Gate: ✅ PASSED

Summary

Pull Request Review: fix: enforce QA section boundaries and harden RAG indexing

Status	PASS
Risk Level	LOW
Review Coverage	23 files analyzed in depth
Confidence	HIGH

---

Executive Summary

This PR strengthens QA document section-boundary enforcement across prompt generation, parsing, orchestration, preview, and public sharing flows, while also hardening RAG branch ownership and indexing behavior. Cross-file review found the relevant contracts and authorization boundaries consistently aligned, with no blocking issues identified. Overall implementation risk is assessed as low.

Recommendation

Decision: PASS

The PR is recommended for approval. No additional conditions or follow-up actions are required based on the completed review.

---

Analysis completed on 2026-08-14 13:15:22 | View Full Report | Pull Request

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@rostilos, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 51 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: be560d1b-7653-45cc-959d-fda2271ebfcb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfa5049 and 37e7a8e.

📒 Files selected for processing (24)

• frontend
• java-ecosystem/libs/analysis-api/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/analysisapi/rag/RagOperationsService.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/analysis-engine/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/analysisengine/processor/analysis/BranchAnalysisProcessor.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/analysis-engine/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/analysisengine/processor/analysis/BranchAnalysisProcessorTest.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/core/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/core/model/project/config/RagConfig.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/core/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/core/service/qadoc/QaDocContentParser.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/core/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/core/model/project/config/RagConfigTest.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/core/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/core/service/qadoc/QaDocContentParserTest.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/rag-engine/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/ragengine/branch/BranchIndexMaintenanceService.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/rag-engine/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/ragengine/service/RagOperationsServiceImpl.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/rag-engine/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/ragengine/branch/BranchIndexMaintenanceServiceTest.java
• java-ecosystem/libs/rag-engine/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/ragengine/service/RagOperationsServiceImplTest.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/generic/processor/command/QaDocCommandProcessor.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/qadoc/QaAutoDocListener.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/qadoc/QaDocHandoffRetryPolicy.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/qadoc/QaDocPublicPreviewService.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/generic/processor/command/QaDocCommandProcessorTest.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/qadoc/QaDocHandoffRetryPolicyTest.java
• java-ecosystem/services/pipeline-agent/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/pipelineagent/qadoc/QaDocPublicPreviewServiceTest.java
• java-ecosystem/services/web-server/src/main/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/webserver/publicshare/qadoc/QaDocShareProvider.java
• java-ecosystem/services/web-server/src/test/java/org/rostilos/codecrow/webserver/publicshare/qadoc/QaDocShareProviderTest.java
• python-ecosystem/inference-orchestrator/src/service/qa_documentation/qa_doc_orchestrator.py
• python-ecosystem/inference-orchestrator/src/utils/prompts/constants_qa_doc.py
• python-ecosystem/inference-orchestrator/tests/test_qa_documentation.py

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}