-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.6k
run-make-fulldeps/foreign-exceptions loops on armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf #67242
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Closed
Copy link
Labels
A-FFIArea: Foreign function interface (FFI)Area: Foreign function interface (FFI)A-testsuiteArea: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustcArea: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustcC-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.O-ArmTarget: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 stateTarget: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 stateT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Description
Activity
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-FFIArea: Foreign function interface (FFI)Area: Foreign function interface (FFI)A-testsuiteArea: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustcArea: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustcC-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.O-ArmTarget: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 stateTarget: 32-bit Arm processors (armv6, armv7, thumb...), including 64-bit Arm in AArch32 stateT-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
When I tested 1.40.0-beta.5 on Fedora rawhide,
run-make-fulldeps/foreign-exceptionsnever completed onarmv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf. When I run that test on arm directly, I get:The same happens when I use official builds of Rust 1.40-beta and 1.41-nightly, so it's not just a problem with Fedora's build of rustc or LLVM. This test didn't exist before #65646, but running 1.39 on the current test just fails even earlier, as expected, "entered unreachable code: catch_unwind should not have caught foreign exception."
I tried compiling the C++ part with GCC 9.2.1 and Clang 9.0.0, both with the same result. That's using libstdc++ either way though, because we don't have LLVM's libc++ available.
cc @Amanieu