Skip to content

chore: bump secrets extensions to allow exclusions [PS-715] - #7052

Open
ancasnyk wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/PS-715/dotsnyk-exclusions-secrets
Open

chore: bump secrets extensions to allow exclusions [PS-715]#7052
ancasnyk wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/PS-715/dotsnyk-exclusions-secrets

Conversation

@ancasnyk

@ancasnyk ancasnyk commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Submission Checklist

  • Follows CONTRIBUTING guidelines
  • Commit messages
    are release-note ready, emphasizing
    what was changed, not how.
  • Includes detailed description of changes
  • Contains risk assessment (Low | Medium | High)
  • Highlights breaking API changes (if applicable)
  • Links to automated tests covering new functionality
  • Includes manual testing instructions (if necessary)
  • Updates relevant GitBook documentation (PR link: ___)
  • Includes product update to be announced in the next stable release notes

What does this PR do?

Updates the secrets extension to a new version which supports setting .snyk exclusions for secrets

Where should the reviewer start?

How should this be manually tested?

run snyk secrets test in a folder with a .snyk file that contains a secrets section under exclude in the .snyk file

What's the product update that needs to be communicated to CLI users?

Users are able to exclude files from secrets scanning by adding them to a new "excludes.secrets" section in the .snyk file

@ancasnyk
ancasnyk requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2026 08:25
@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@snyk-pr-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No major issues detected
📚 Repository Context Analyzed

This review considered 4 relevant code sections from 4 files (average relevance: 0.99)

🤖 Repository instructions applied (from AGENTS.md)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant