Repository navigation
candidate_studies: record three rejections and two outcomes - #50
Merged
Merged
Conversation
- PRJNA341808 (larval bacteria/heat, IOCAS): rejected after an expressed-SNP screen on ~2 M reads per run showed each arm is one RNA pool. - PRJNA694496 (thermotolerance-selected line): rejected, groups cannot be recovered from the deposit or the paper. - PRJNA877226 (Tier 2 #9): rejected, infected-only 12 h vs 48 h, no control. - PRJNA1196326 (Tier 2 #8): failed QC as IOCAS2024_OA_TRANSGEN (#17). - PRJNA913164 (Tier 2 #6): registered as GEORGE2023_HEATWAVE_PLOIDY (#18); it is published (George et al. 2023). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
main rejected PRJNA341808 independently (2026-10-14) with scripts/prescreen_replicates.py. Resolved by keeping main's account and table row (plus the rejection marker), and adding the expressed-SNP result as agreeing but not decisive on its own: large larval pools from one cross converge on their parents' allele frequencies, as main's text notes. The "lessons" paragraph now points at the pre-screen script and states the genotype check's limit. The other three entries (IOCAS2024, PRJNA694496, PRJNA877226) are kept. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Docs only: updates
docs/candidate_studies.mdwith recent screen-outs so nobody curates them again.Rejected:
PRJNA694496(thermotolerance-selected line): the groups can't be recovered. There's one BioSample for all runs, vendor run IDs, and no mapping in the paper.PRJNA877226(Tier 2 [study] CIBNOR2021_HEAT_RRSS (PRJNA690951) #9): infected-only, 12 h vs 48 h, with no control. It is likely the high-temperature arm of [study] LI2022_LOWSAL_VIBRIO (PRJNA756710) #26's experiment; borrowing [study] LI2022_LOWSAL_VIBRIO (PRJNA756710) #26's controls across BioProjects is not done.PRJNA341808(larval bacteria / heat):mainrejected it independently on 2026-10-14 withscripts/prescreen_replicates.py, and that account is kept as the primary one. This PR adds my expressed-SNP result (within-group 0.062 vs 0.057 one-RNA noise) as agreeing but not decisive: large larval pools from one cross converge on their parents' allele frequencies either way, asmain's text notes.Outcomes:
PRJNA1196326(Parse per-run design labels for single-BioSample deposits #8): failed QC asIOCAS2024_OA_TRANSGEN([study] IOCAS2024_OA_TRANSGEN (PRJNA1196326) #17).PRJNA913164(Obtain the heat-resistant / heat-susceptible family RNA-seq data (Arredondo-Espinoza et al. 2023) #6): registered asGEORGE2023_HEATWAVE_PLOIDY([study] GEORGE2023_HEATWAVE_PLOIDY (PRJNA913164) #18). It is published (George et al. 2023).Lessons paragraph: one BioSample per group is the cheapest early warning of pseudo-replication. Replication can be checked before download with
prescreen_replicates.py. The genotype check complements it for single animals or small pools, but not for large sibling pools.Merge conflict with
mainresolved (2026-10-15): both sides had edited thePRJNA341808table row and the Rejected section.🤖 Generated with Claude Code