Skip to content

Completed Trees2 - #1601

Open
Keerthi0910 wants to merge 4 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
Keerthi0910:master
Open

Completed Trees2#1601
Keerthi0910 wants to merge 4 commits into
super30admin:masterfrom
Keerthi0910:master

Conversation

@Keerthi0910

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Construct Binary Tree from Inorder and Postorder Traversal (Problem1.java)

  1. Correctness: Your solution correctly solves the problem. The logic of using postorder to find the root and inorder to split into left/right subtrees is correctly implemented. The order of building right before left is correct since postIndex starts from the end.

  2. Time Complexity: O(n) - matches the reference solution. Each node is visited once, and HashMap lookups are O(1) average.

  3. Space Complexity: O(n) - matches the reference solution. The HashMap stores n entries, and the recursion stack can go up to O(n) in the worst case (skewed tree).

  4. Code Quality: The code is well-structured and readable. Good use of comments explaining the approach. The variable naming is clear (postIndex, rootVal, rootIndex). The solution follows the same approach as the reference solution.

  5. Efficiency: The solution is efficient. One minor optimization could be to make map and postIndex local to the method or pass them as parameters to avoid instance variables, but this is a stylistic choice.

Minor suggestions:

  • The comment "Space Complexity O(n)" and "Time Complexity o(n)" have inconsistent capitalization (O vs o).
  • Consider adding edge case handling or input validation.
  • The helper method could be made private for better encapsulation.

Overall, the solution is correct, efficient, and well-implemented. It matches the reference solution in both approach and complexity.

VERDICT: PASS


Sum Root to Leaf Numbers (Problem2.java)

Your solution is correct and follows the same approach as the reference solution. Here are some points to consider:

Strengths:

  • The logic is correct and the DFS approach is appropriate for this problem.
  • The code is readable and well-structured.
  • Time complexity is optimal at O(n).

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Space Complexity Comment: You stated O(1) space complexity, but the actual space complexity is O(h) due to the recursive call stack. Be accurate in your comments.

  2. Variable Initialization: It's good practice to explicitly initialize instance variables. Consider int sum = 0; instead of just int sum;.

  3. State Reset: If you want to make the solution more robust, consider resetting sum = 0 at the beginning of sumNumbers() to handle cases where the method might be called multiple times on the same instance.

  4. Indentation: The indentation for int sum; is slightly off. Make sure to maintain consistent indentation throughout.

  5. Method Visibility: The helper method could be private to follow encapsulation best practices, as it's an internal helper method.

Overall, your solution is functionally correct and demonstrates a good understanding of the problem.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants