Skip to content

Reconcile delivered assignment and import contracts - #3043

Merged
Chris0Jeky merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/0912-wave-record
Sep 12, 2026
Merged

Chris0Jeky merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/0912-wave-record

Conversation

@Chris0Jeky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Correct the stale assignment-delivery record: PR #2977 is merged and blocker #2981 is closed, with both multiple assignments and explicit importer-or-unassigned mapping on main. STATUS and the masterplan now separate that delivered contract from its tracked permission/webhook residuals and the future effort-estimate work.

Verification: live GitHub merge/issue state; #2977's merge is an ancestor of the tested base f0eb7a3; current import-validator contract inspected. node scripts/check-docs-governance.mjs, node scripts/check-doc-links.mjs (698 Markdown files, zero broken relative links), and git diff --check pass. Original behavioral tests were not rerun for this documentation correction. No human checkbox or issue #2240/#2981 state changed.

Closes #3036. Human actions remain in OUTSTANDING_TASKS.md.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-12T14:27:18.111099Z 82fae6b PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 82fae6bdc9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/STATUS.md
Comment thread docs/IMPLEMENTATION_MASTERPLAN.md
@Chris0Jeky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Fresh-context independent review completed: clean at 82fae6b. Merge/import contract claims match live evidence and the diff grants no authority or false behavioral verification. Connector findings were triaged once: one tracked in #3044, one declined with the actual open permission issue references. No fix commit or extra review round is required for these nonblocking observations.

@Chris0Jeky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Delivery is coordinated through integration PR #3050, which preserves this PR's exact source head and commits. It qualifies all reviewed product slices against main1931da65d after the Smart CI repair; no source merge-resolution changes were required. Local source evidence remains scoped to its recorded head, and the integration's hosted checks and bounded interaction review qualify the combined delivery. Existing review feedback is triaged once; this source PR will be reconciled after the integration lands.

@Chris0Jeky
Chris0Jeky merged commit 0d4dd18 into main Sep 12, 2026
21 checks passed
@Chris0Jeky
Chris0Jeky deleted the codex/0912-wave-record branch September 12, 2026 16:24
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from Review to Done in Taskdeck Execution Sep 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Docs] STATUS says explicit import mapping is not delivered, but it is on main

1 participant