Skip to content

docs: mark graph integrity implemented (#232) - #253

Merged
toddysm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/graph-integrity-close-out-25e59c6f
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

toddysm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/graph-integrity-close-out-25e59c6f

Conversation

@toddysm

@toddysm toddysm commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Third and final authorized PR for #232, after start inventory #251 and implementation #252.

Move only graph-integrity from In progress to Implemented, link native child #250 and implementation PR #252, and retain classified architecture/user-documentation links with2026-10 landing. Unrelated planned rows and inventory debt remain unchanged.

Completion evidence: #250 is closed with source, user docs and architecture changes merged in1415ccdf57ba560728c7820fb3a3258d1156f56e. Final tested source f2b2478 passed146 hosted/local graph/HTTP tests, ten-file types, schema/workflow/shell/Helm/docs checks, and required CodeQL. Exact-head Copilot recommended approval with no active issues. Run:https://github.com/toddysm/cssc-framework/actions/runs/40749957490.

Validation: git diff --check; exactly one six-column Implemented row; no remaining In-progress graph-integrity row; classified architecture/user links and correct landing month; all relative documentation links resolve. Local self-review: no findings. Only one Markdown file changed, so application suites and registry operations are not rerun for this docs PR. Testing mode: hosted, with normal required CodeQL and authorized Copilot review.

Parent #232 intentionally remains open until this reviewed close-out PR merges and completion is rechecked.

Record the reviewed reference diagnostics, deployment evidence and temporal query implementation with architecture and user-documentation links.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-28T19:04:44.427040Z ff5b708 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔵 Needs a closer look

Parent issue #232 is already closed despite the requirement to keep it open until this PR merges and completion is rechecked, so the tracking gate needs human reconciliation.

No open issues 🎉

What changed in this PR

Closes out the graph-integrity inventory update following implementation in PR #252, while leaving unrelated planned work unchanged.

Changes:

  • Moves graph-integrity from In progress to Implemented with a 2026-10 landing date.
  • Links parent issue #232, implementation child #250, and PR #252, retaining labeled architecture and user-documentation links.
  • Replaces the now-empty In progress table with “None currently.”
File Description
docs/​project-state.md Records graph integrity as implemented with tracking references and documentation links.

Review effort: Balanced

@toddysm

toddysm commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Reconciled the tracking gate raised in the review summary before merging this PR. Live issue history showed #232 was auto-closed by start PR #251, whose body had an unintended negated closing-keyword sentence; GitHub still matches that phrase. I removed the closing reference from #251 and reopened #232. The actual parent state is now OPEN; native child #250 is correctly CLOSED through #252. This documentation PR has no auto-closing references. After this reviewed inventory change merges, completion will be checked and #232 closed explicitly in the required order. No source or close-out commit changed.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

No active review issues remain for the graph integrity inventory update.

No open issues 🎉

Review effort: Balanced

@toddysm
toddysm merged commit ed64896 into main Oct 28, 2026
5 checks passed
@toddysm
toddysm deleted the chore/graph-integrity-close-out-25e59c6f branch October 28, 2026 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants