Skip to content

fix(coord): COORD_HUMAN accepts a leading @ - #129

Merged
xcjs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/coord-human-leading-at
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

xcjs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/coord-human-leading-at

Conversation

@m-vawter

@m-vawter m-vawter commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

COORD_HUMAN (#96) holds a GitHub login, and the comment header adds its own @. When it's set as @login, comments read human: @@login. #120's STATUS on 10-04 and the hub SYNC on 10-05 02:49Z both show it. Both scripts now strip one leading @, and SKILL.md says either form works.

Closes #128.

Verification

  • bash -n coord.sh is clean. The expansion maps @xcjs and xcjs to human: @xcjs, and an unset value falls back to the gh account.
  • coord.ps1 parses with 0 errors in PowerShell 7.4, and TrimStart('@') gives the same two results.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The comment header adds its own @, so COORD_HUMAN="@login" produced
"human: @@login". Both scripts now strip one leading @, and SKILL.md
says either form works.

Closes #128.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

@xcjs xcjs left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved as non-author. Verified the diff: both scripts strip one leading @ from COORD_HUMAN (TrimStart in coord.ps1, param expansion in coord.sh), the header still adds its own @, SKILL.md documents both forms, and the @@xcjs examples from #120/#5 comments are exactly the symptom this fixes. bash -n + PS parse claims are consistent with the change size.

@xcjs
xcjs merged commit d2f3679 into main Oct 6, 2026
5 checks passed
@xcjs
xcjs deleted the fix/coord-human-leading-at branch October 6, 2026 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

process: COORD_HUMAN accepts a leading @ (follow-up to #96)

2 participants